Trump’s List Of Secretary Of State Candidates Tightens, And Rand Paul Goes OFF On Bolton…”The Man Is A Menace…”

Trump’s List Of Secretary Of State Candidates Tightens, And Rand Paul Goes OFF On Bolton…”The Man Is A Menace…”

Apparently, Trump has scheduled a Saturday meeting with Mitt Romney to discuss his Secretary of State pick.  Top contenders now include “former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton, U.S. Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee, and South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, who met Trump on Thursday.”

OMG SO JUICY, y’all.

Personally, I’m now rooting for Nikki Haley, who I’m BEYOND delighted to see on this list and who – when she’s done doing all this important political stuff –  will more than likely become an official Chick on the Right, because we’re totally kindred spirits, so DUH.

Anywho, when it comes to Bolton, Rand Paul isn’t holding back.  And he’s telling it like he feels it is about John Bolton, one of the main names that’s been floating around the past couple of days.

The Kentucky junior senator wrote a pretty scathing piece about Bolton, and I’m including a big ol’ chunk of it here:

Rumors are that Donald Trump might pick John Bolton for Secretary of State. Heaven forbid.


One of the things I occasionally liked about the President-elect was his opposition to the Iraq war and regime change. He not only grasped the mistake of that war early, but also seemed to fully understand how it disrupted the balance of power in the Middle East and even emboldened Iran.

We liberated Iraq, but today their best friend is Iran, their second greatest ally is Russia, and their third strongest alliance is with Syria. Trump really seems to get the lesson. Hillary Clinton never did.

Most importantly right now, John Bolton never learned and never will.


Bolton is a longtime member of the failed Washington elite that Trump vowed to oppose, hell-bent on repeating virtually every foreign policy mistake the U.S. has made in the last 15 years — particularly those Trump promised to avoid as president.


John Bolton more often stood with Hillary Clinton and against what Donald Trump has advised.

None of this is secret. It’s all out there. Perhaps the incoming administration should take a closer look.


Bolton was one of the loudest advocates of overthrowing Saddam Hussein and still stupefyingly insists it was the right call 13 years later. “I still think the decision to overthrow Saddam was correct,” Bolton said just last year.

Trump, rightly, believes that decision was a colossal mistake that destabilized the region. “Iraq used to be no terrorists,” Trump said in 2015. “(N)ow it’s the Harvard of terrorism.”


“If you look at Iraq from years ago, I’m not saying he was a nice guy, he was a horrible guy,” Trump said of Saddam Hussein, “but it was a lot better than it is right now.”


Trump has said U.S. intervention in Iraq in 2003 “helped to throw the region into chaos and gave ISIS the space it needs to grow and prosper.” In contrast, Bolton has said explicitly that he wants to repeat Iraq-style regime change in Syrian and Iran.

You can’t learn from mistakes if you don’t see mistakes.


Trump has blamed George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton for helping to create ISIS — but should add John Bolton to that list, who essentially agreed with all three on our regime change debacles.


In 2011, Bolton bashed Obama “for his refusal to directly target Gaddafi” and declared, “there is a strategic interest in toppling Gaddafi… But Obama missed it.” In fact, Obama actually took Bolton’s advice and bombed the Libyan dictator into the next world. Secretary of State Clinton bragged, “We came, we saw, he died.”


When Trump was asked last year if Libya and the region would be more stable today with Gaddafi in power, he replied“100 percent.” Mr. Trump is 100 percent right.


No man is more out of touch with the situation in the Middle East or more dangerous to our national security than Bolton.


All nuance is lost on the man. The fact that Russia has had a base in Syria for 50 years doesn’t deter Bolton from calling for all out, no holds barred war in Syria. Bolton criticized the current administration for offering only a tepid war. For Bolton, only a hot-blooded war to create democracy across the globe is demanded.

Woodrow Wilson would be proud, but the parents of our soldiers should be mortified. War should be the last resort, never the first. War should be understood to be a hell no one wishes for. Dwight Eisenhower understood this when he wrote, “I hate war like only a soldier can, the stupidity, the banality, the futility.”


Bolton would not understand this because, like many of his generation, he used every privilege to avoid serving himself. Bolton said, with the threat of the Vietnam draft over his head, that “he had no desire to die in a Southeast Asian rice paddy.” But he’s seems to be okay with your son or daughter dying wherever his neoconservative impulse leads us: “Even before the Iraq War, John Bolton was a leading brain behind the neoconservatives’ war-and-conquest agenda,” notes The American Conservative’s Jon Utley.


At a time when Americans thirst for change and new thinking, Bolton is an old hand at failed foreign policy.


The man is a menace.


That’s pretty much the gist of it.  Again, you can read the rest of it here, but yeah.  I think it’s safe to say that Rand isn’t a member of Bolton’s fan club.  Perhaps he’s jockeying for some position in the Trump White House?  Lord only knows. Anything’s possible at this point.  Someone needs to be on Trump elevator watch for him. Pass the popcorn.


Related Posts